Biochemical Journal - Electronic submission and Peer Review Biochemical Society
HomeSearchFeedbackLinksJoin the Society
MeetingsMembershipPolicy ActivitiesProfessional ActivitiesEducationThe SocietyContacts

































Annual survey of graduate employment 1995


Key findings

First degree graduates

  • The largest grouping again moved on to further biochemical training, although the overall proportion decreased from 35.0 to 30.8%. As in the 1994 survey, the next largest grouping entered non-science-based employment (11.1%); there was a small increase in entrants to industrial research (up by 1.7% to 7.5%) but less than 1% change in proportions entering academic research (3.4%), other laboratory work (5.0%), teacher training (5.7%) or other science-based work (3.3%).
  • Classes 1 and 2 graduates from post-1992 universities were less likely than those from pre-1992 institutions to continue biochemical training (13.2 compared to 38.3%), but in percentage terms more entered industrial research, academic research laboratories and non-science-based employment.
  • The low overall unemployment rate (5.4%) compared well with national figures for biological sciences (9.9%) and for graduates of all disciplines (8.5%).

Higher graduates

  • The proportion of MScs moving to further biochemical training decreased from 29.6 to 24.0%, and those entering academic research from 11.3 to 7.6%; on the other hand there was a marked increase in entrants to non-science-based employment (up from 2.7 to 7.6%) and a small increase to industrial research (from 7.8 to 8.7%).
  • The proportion of overseas students (subsequently returned home) among MSc graduates increased markedly (from 12.1 to 23.4%) whereas it decreased among PhDs (from 10.9 to 7.1%).
  • Proportions of PhDs researching in academia (41.8%) or industry (12.6%) increased slightly, whereas there was a decline in those undertaking further biochemical training abroad (from 3.3 to 0.3%) or working abroad (from 7.0 to 5.2%); percentages entering other classes of employment were remarkably similar to 1994 values.
  • The unemployment rate of MSc graduates decreased slightly (from 5.7 to 4.1%) whereas that of PhDs appeared to have increased (from 3.0 to 5.8%).

1995 Graduate Employment Survey Report

General information

The 1995 survey was compiled from questionnaires returned by 58 Departments in the UK (a separate report is written for graduates from Departments in the Republic of Ireland). The Professional and Education Committee thanks those Departments that contributed data (see Appendix 1).

For the purposes of this survey 'biochemistry graduates' were defined as those students for whom biochemistry constituted at least 50% of the total degree course, irrespective of the title of the degree obtained. A list of all first degree titles that were considered by the responding Departments to meet this criterion is given in Appendix 2. MSc, whether taught or by research, and MPhil degrees, were not differentiated but are referred to as 'MSc'. Appendix 3 lists the courses from which the figures concerning MSc biochemistry graduates were drawn. The format of the questionnaire differed from that of the 1994 survey only in that question 1.4 was introduced in order to identify the number of intercalated medical students.

Whilst the number of Departments completing the questionnaire was a little lower for 1995 than for 1994 (69), and the number of UK graduates analysed correspondingly lower (2238 compared to 2467), it is considered that meaningful comparisons between the two years can be made from the percentage figures for graduates falling within particular employment categories.

Total numbers of biochemistry graduates of all levels entering employment

The actual numbers of UK biochemistry graduates of all levels entering different categories of employment are listed in Table 1and shown as a bar chart in Figure 1. The categories are defined and explained in Appendix 4. Figure 2 indicates in the form of a pie diagram the percentage of total graduates entering particular types of occupation. For simplicity, some of the categories listed in Table 1have been combined in this and in subsequent figures and tables; thus, data on hospital, civil service or public authority laboratories were pooled to represent laboratory-based biochemical work other than research in academia or industry; teacher training and teaching in higher education were also combined, as were the two categories of unemployed graduates.

By far the largest single group of biochemistry graduates continued with further biochemical study or training in the UK (610, 27.4% total), this obviously being skewed towards first degree and MSc graduates (Table 1, Figure 1 ). However, both numerically and as a percentage of total graduates these figures represented notable decreases compared to 1994 (737, 29.9% total). The proportion of students continuing biochemical training abroad was also much lower in 1995 (0.3% compared to 1.2% in 1994). The next largest groups of graduates entered careers requiring graduate-level ability but no particular biochemical knowledge such as accounting and retail management (215, 9.6% total), followed by research in academia (202, 9.0% total) and research in industry (186, 8.3% total). These percentage figures were not greatly different from the 1994 survey (9.3, 9.3 and 6.8% total, respectively) although industrial research now appeared more attractive. There was less than about 1% difference between 1995 and 1994 percentages for other categories of employment other than 1.3, non-biochemical study or training (3.3 compared to 6.5% total). In this case the difference was artificial and only arose because in the 1995 survey intercalated medical students (3.3% total) were pulled out as a separate category rather than being included in 1.3. The proportion of graduates working abroad decreased slightly in 1995 (1.4% compared to 2.1% total). The number of foreign students who had been trained in the UK and had now returned to the country of origin increased slightly in percentage terms (5.5% of total students compared to 4.4%).

Graduates remaining in Biochemistry

Data in Table 1 are dissected further in Table 2 to indicate percentages of first degree graduates of different classes, and MSc and PhD graduates, in the various types of occupation. This table enables easy comparisons across degrees. Whilst the largest proportion of first degree graduates (30.8%) moved on to further biochemical study or training, overwhelmingly in the UK, this figure was lower than in 1994 (35.0%), 1993 (33.6%) or 1992 (37.6%). The decrease overall was reflected in the figures for classes 1 and 2 graduates continuing biochemical study (down 3.9%). For those Departments that were able to supply the appropriate information an analysis was made of the number and proportion of graduates with class 1 and class 2 degrees registering for a higher degree by research (Table 3 ). This revealed that 74.0% of class 1, 42.8% of class 2.1 and 8.7% of class 2.2 graduates commenced a research degree. Of the total number of research students 25.5% had class 1, 64.2% class 2.1 and 10.3% class 2.2 degrees. As in previous years, there was a fairly even spread of classes 1 and 2 first degree graduates between the various biochemistry-based careers such as research in industry (8.0%) or academia (3.6%); work in hospital, public health, public analyst or forensic, laboratories (5.2%); teacher training (6.1%); and science-based non-laboratory work such as management, sales, or marketing in science-based industry, information science and editorial work (2.7%). Whereas the proportions entering academic research and science-based non-laboratory work had declined slightly from 1994 (by 0.4 and 1.0%, respectively), those entering industrial research, teaching, and other forms of laboratory work showed small increases (by 1.9, 1.3 and 0.9%, respectively). A smaller proportion of class 3/ pass degree graduates than of classes 1 and 2 undertook further biochemical training (7.7%, down 4.6% from 1994) or biochemistry-based careers, but a larger proportion entered non-scientific careers (21.0% compared to 9.9%). The small numbers entering most categories of science-based employment were little changed, with the notable exception of an increase from 1.7 to 8.2% in entrants to science-based non-laboratory work.

The largest single group of MSc graduates (24.0%) continued biochemical training but this again represented a decrease of 5.6% from 1994. Similarly, although a higher proportion of MSc than first degree graduates entered research in academia (7.6%) this was actually a reduction of 3.7% on 1994. On the other hand numbers entering research in industry (8.7%) or other categories of science-based employment tended to be a little higher. As would be expected, the largest single group of PhDs continued research in universities and research institutes (41.8%), with fewer researching in industry (12.6%), both figures being slightly higher than in the 1994 survey. The proportion of PhDs undertaking further biochemical training increased from 9.1 to 11.3%, but a notable difference from the previous survey was the marked reduction in the proportion of these graduates who studied abroad rather than in the UK (down from 36.3 to 2.7% of the group). Proportions entering other science-based careers were remarkably similar to 1994 figures. It is likely that a large proportion of the 5.2% of PhDs working abroad were researching in academia but this was not revealed by the survey. Of those entering teaching, equal numbers started PGCE courses and teaching directly in higher education, whereas essentially all first degree and MSc graduates in this category entered teacher training.

The percentages of the three levels of graduates remaining in biochemistry are shown in Fig 3 . Graduates entering teacher training have been included in the 'biochemical employment' category since it is anticipated that they will become science teachers, whereas in this figure intercalated medical students have been included in the 'non-biochemical training category'. The percentage of first degree graduates remaining in biochemistry was similar to that in 1994 (55.7 compared to56.9%) and that of MScs somewhat lower (47.9 compared to 54.8%), whereas PhDs showed an increase for the second successive year (74.4 compared to 69.9% in 1994 and 67.7% in 1993). There have been recent reports from a number of sources that increasing numbers of British PhDs are either choosing to, or having to, enter careers outside their PhD discipline, but there was no real evidence of this for biochemistry PhDs in the present survey (although the small increase in unemployment rate referred to later should be noted).

Graduates pursuing careers not involving biochemistry

This grouping covers those graduates who entered training for, or commenced, employment requiring degree-level ability but no specific biochemical knowledge, such as accountancy or retail management, and also intercalating students returned to their medical studies. The proportion of total graduates choosing a career outside biochemistry was 16.2%, similar to the 1994 figure of 15.8%. Not surprisingly, a larger proportion of first degree (and in particular class 3/ pass degree graduates-see Table 1) than of the more specialised MSc or PhD graduates was included in this grouping (19.2% overall compared to 8.8 and 2.9%, respectively). In comparison to 1994 the most noticeable feature was the increase of 3.1% in MSc graduates choosing a career outside biochemistry.

The conclusions that can be drawn from the survey are limited to some extent by the lack of knowledge concerning the employment of British graduates working abroad and of overseas students returning home, and by the relatively high percentages of first degree and MSc graduates whose employment position was not known (11.9% overall, and 11.7%). Relative to total numbers few first degree or MSc graduates took employment abroad but a significant proportion of PhDs did (5.2%, down 1.8%). There was a marked increase from 12.1 to 23.4% in the percentage of MSc graduates who were from overseas, but a reduction from 10.9 to 7.1% for PhD graduates. In the case of PhDs this appears to be a continuing trend (% of PhD graduates from overseas for the last four years:15.4,14.2,10.9,7.1).

Comparison of destinations of first degree graduates from pre- and post-1992 universities

In view of the opening up of higher education in recent years to a broader range of students it was of interest to compare career destinations of graduates from pre- and post-1992 university Departments. The present analysis was limited to first degrees since, as yet, there were insufficient MSc and PhD graduates from the post-1992 universities to enable a meaningful comparison. The proportion of class 1 and 2 degrees was similar for the two groups of universities, 88.8% for pre-1992 and 89.2% for post-1992, but a larger percentage of this group from pre-1992 universities undertook further biochemical study or training (38.3% compared to 13.2%) (Table 4 ), as was also evidenced by the breakdown of graduates registered for research degrees (Table 3 ). Relatively larger proportions of classes 1 and 2 graduates from the post-1992 universities entered careers in industry (14.5%) or in non-science-based employment (13.9%), consistent with the vocational mission of many post-1992 institutions. Perhaps surprising is the larger proportion of graduates from post-1992 universities moving on to research in universities and research institutes (7.6% compared to 2.7% for pre-1992 institutions). Proportions entering teacher training were similar for the two groups of universities. It would be unwise to attempt over-fine comparisons from the present data because of the large percentage of graduates from post-1992 universities in the 'unknown destination' category.

Graduates who were unemployed at the time of the survey

Of the 8.7% of total biochemistry graduates known to be unplaced at eight months after graduation only 5.4% were actively seeking employment, the remainder taking time out to travel, start a family, or in temporary jobs such as chalet staff or au-pairs whilst evaluating longer-term careers. This figure is almost identical to the 1994 value (5.2%) (Table 1), which had appeared to be on a shallow rising unemployment curve (see 1994 survey). There were some differences between the three levels of graduates in comparison to the 1994 survey. In particular, the level of unemployment of PhDs appeared to have increased (5.8% compared to 3.0%), and of MScs to have reduced slightly (4.1% compared to5.7%), whereas that of first degree graduates was essentially unchanged (4.7% for classes 1 and 2, 10.8 % for class 3/ pass). However, the large numbers in the 'unknown destination' category for first degree and MSc graduates should be noted since these could affect the unemployment figures.

The unemployment rate for biochemistry first degree graduates (5.4% overall) compared favourably with those for other disciplines. According to First destinations of students leaving higher education institutions, 1994/95 (Higher Education Statistics Agency) 8.5% of first degree graduates of all disciplines were estimated to be unemployed at approximately six months after graduating and 9.9% of biological sciences graduates (a group comprising biologists, molecular biologists and biophysicists, botanists, zoologists, geneticists, microbiologists and psychologists in addition to biochemists). The corresponding figures for higher graduates were 6.0% unemployment for all disciplines and 4.4% for biological sciences, so that the present data for biochemistry MSc and PhD graduates were in line with national data. The comparatively low level of unemployment of biochemistry first degree graduates, coupled with the observation in this survey that they enter a wide range of careers, again supports the contention that biochemistry is regarded by employers as a numerate discipline that develops analytical thinking, creativity in problem solving, and the ability to handle large amounts of complex information, skills which are in broad demand.


Table 1 Numbers of UK 1995 biochemistry graduates, of all levels, entering employment.

Type of employment First degree After MSc
/MPhil
After PhD Total % of total graduates 1995 (1994)
Class 1 and 2Class 3/ Pass
1.1
Further biochemical study
52115403461027.4%
(29.9%)
1.2
Teacher Training
935441064.7%
(4.1%)
1.3
Non-biochemical study or training
65702743.3%
(6.5%)
1.4
Intercalating medical students
70021733.3%
(-)
2.1
Research Appointments - Industry
125715391868.3%
(6.8%)
2.2
Research appointments- Higher Education
573131292029.0%
(9.3%)
2.3
Hospital Laboratories
684511883.9%
(2.8%)
2.4
Civil Service and Public Authority Laboratories
12411180.8%
(1.4%)
2.5
Non-laboratory Based Employment
421637683.0%
(3.1%)
2.6
Teaching-Higher Education
200460.3%
(0.2%)
3
Other Employment
155411362159.6%
(9.3%)
4.1
British students-Employment abroad
151016321.4%
(2.1%)
4.2
British students-Study/training abroad
501170.3%
(1.2%)
4.3
Overseas students-Returned home
521040221245.5%
(4.4%)
5.1
Unplaced, not seeking employment
461378743.3%
(2.3%)
5.2
Unplaced, seeking employment
74217181205.4%
(5.2%)
6.1
Unknown
1614820623510.5%
(11.6%)
TOTALS15631951713092238


Table 2 Destinations of 1995 Biochemistry graduates

Data for 1758 first degree, 171 MSc/MPhil and 309 PhD graduates eight months after graduation

% total graduates
First degreeMScPhD
OverallClass 1&2Class 3/Pass
Further biochemical study or training
UK30.533.37.723.411.0
Abroad0.30.300.60.3
Returned to medical studies4.04.501.20.3
Research in Universities and Research Institutes3.43.61.57.641.8
Research in Industry7.58.03.68.712.6
Work in hospital/ civil service/ public authority labs.5.05.24.23.53.9
Science-based non-laboratory work3.32.78.21.82.3
Teacher training/ teaching5.76.12.62.32.6
Non-biochemical study or training4.14.23.600.7
Non-science-based employment11.19.921.07.61.9
British graduates working abroad, career unspecified0.91.00.505.2
Overseas students returned home3.53.35.123.47.1
Unplaced, including those not currently seeking work8.87.617.58.28.4
Unknown11.910.324.511.71.9


Table 3 Proportions of first degree graduates of different classes registering for a higher degree by research

Data from 37 pre-1992 and 8 post-1992 university Departments that were able to provide this information

Class 1Class 2.1Class 2.2
No. registered % Class total No. registered % Class total No registered % Class total
Overall11474.0%28742.8%468.7%
Pre-1992 universities11275.2%26245.8%4210.3%
Post-1992 universities240.0%2525.5%43.3%
% of total registering for higher degree within each degree class25.5%64.2%10.3%


Table 4 Comparison of destinations of first degree graduates from pre- and post-1992 universities

Data for 1434 graduates from 48 pre-1992 universities and 324 graduates from 10 post-1992 universities

% total graduates
Pre-1992 universities Post-1992 universities
Class1&2Class 3/PassClass 1&2Class 3/Pass #
Further biochemical study or training
UK37.98.813.22.9
Abroad0.4000
Returned to medical studies5.500 0
Research in Universities and Research Institutes2.71.97.60
Research in Industry6.54.414.50
Work in hospital/ civil service/ public authority labs.4.71.96.914.3
Science-based non-laboratory work2.410.03.80
Teacher training/ teaching6.01.96.65.7
Non-biochemical study or training4.43.83.12.9
Non-science-based employment9.022.413.914.3
British graduates working abroad, career unspecified1.10.60.30
Overseas students returned home3.86.31.40
Unplaced, including those not currently seeking work8.116.85.920.0
Unknown7.521.222.840.0

# Data for 35 students only













Appendix 1 Departments providing data used in the 1995 survey

Bath, Biology and Biochemistry
Birmingham, Biochemistry
Bradford, Biomedical Sciences
Bristol, Biochemistry
Brunel, Biology and Biochemistry
Buckingham, Life Sciences
Cambridge, Biochemistry
Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School London, Biochemistry
Derby, Biological Sciences
Dublin City, Biological Sciences
Dundee, Biochemistry
Durham, Biological Sciences
East Anglia, Life Sciences
Edinburgh, Biochemistry
Edinburgh, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology
Glasgow, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Heriot-Watt, Biological Sciences
Hull, Applied Biology
Imperial College London, Biochemistry
Institute of Psychiatry London, Neuroscience
Keele, Biological Sciences
Kent, Biosciences
King's College London, Life Sciences
Kingston, Life Sciences
Lancaster, Biological Sciences
Leeds, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Liverpool, Biochemistry
Liverpool John Moores, Biomolecular Sciences
Manchester, Biological Sciences
Maynooth College Republic of Ireland, Biology
Nene College, Northampton, Life Sciences
Newcastle, Biochemistry and Genetics
Nottingham, Applied Biochemistry and Food Science
Nottingham, Biochemistry
Nottingham Trent, Life Sciences
North London, Life Sciences
Oxford, Clinical Biochemistry
Paisley, Biological Sciences
Queen Mary and Westfield London, Biochemistry
Queens Belfast, Biology and Biochemistry
Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine London, Biochemistry
Royal Holloway London, Biochemistry
Salford, Biological Sciences
Sheffield, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology
Sheffield Hallam, Biomedical Sciences
Staffordshire, Biology
St Andrews, Cell and Molecular Biology
St George's Hospital Medical School London, Biochemistry
Stirling, Biological and Molecular Sciences
Strathclyde, Bioscience and Biotechnology
Surrey, Biological Sciences
Sussex, Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology
UMIST, Biochemistry and Applied Molecular Biology
University College Cork, Biochemistry
University College Galway, Biochemistry
University of Wales, Bangor, Biological Sciences
University of Wales, Cardiff, Molecular and Medical Biosciences
University of Wales, Swansea, Biochemistry/Biological Sciences
Warwick, Biological Sciences
Wolverhampton, Applied Sciences
Wye College London, Biological Sciences
York, Biochemistry



Appendix 2 Titles of first degree courses that were considered by the responding institutions to contain at least 50% biochemistry (the figures are the numbers of institutions offering a course with that particular title)

Animal sciences
Applied biochemistry					4
Applied biochemistry and food science
Applied biological sciences
Applied biology						2
Applied cell biology and biochemistry
Bioanalytical science
Biochemistry						33
Biochemistry/chemistry (Joint Honours)			2
Biochemistry (toxicology)
Biochemistry with applied molecular biology
Biochemistry with basic medical sciences
Biochemistry with biological chemistry
Biochemistry with biotechnology				4
Biochemistry with chemistry				2
Biochemistry with clinical biochemistry
Biochemistry with genetics
Biochemistry with German
Biochemistry with immunology				2
Biochemistry with management studies
Biochemistry with medical biochemistry			2
Biochemistry with microbiology				2
Biochemistry with molecular and cell biology
Biochemistry with molecular biology			3
Biochemistry with pharmacology
Biochemistry with pharmacology with sandwich year
Biochemistry with physiology				4
Biochemistry with sandwich year				5
Biochemistry with year in Europe
Biochemistry with year in USA				2
Biological and biochemical sciences
Biological sciences
Biology
Biology with biochemistry
Biomedical chemistry
Biomedical sciences					2
Biomedical technology
Biotechnology
Botany/biochemistry (Joint Honours)
Cell biology and biochemistry
Chemistry with biochemistry
Combined honours (Life Sciences)
Combined studies: biochemistry + 1 other science subject	2
Genetics
Intercalated biochemistry					6
Life sciences (physiological biochemistry)
Marine biology/biochemistry (Joint Honours)
Medical biochemistry					5
Medical molecular biology
Microbiology
Microbiology with biochemistry
Molecular biology					5
Molecular biology and biochemistry
Molecular cell biology					3
Molecular genetics in biotechnology
Special biology (biotechnology)
Special biology (molecular biology)
Zoology/biochemistry (Joint Honours)



Appendix 3 Titles of MSc courses that were considered by the responding institutions to contain at least 50% biochemistry (the figures are the numbers of institutions offering a course with that particular title)

Biochemistry
Biochemistry and genetics
Biochemical endocrinology
Biological sciences					2
Biomedical sciences
Bioreactor systems
Biotechnology
Cellular and molecular plant sciences
Clinical biochemistry with molecular biology
Food biotechnology
Fungal technology
General biochemistry
Genetic manipulation and molecular biology
Medical biochemistry
Neuroscience
Pathological sciences
Plant biochemistry and productivity
Toxicology						2



Appendix 4 A description of the career destinations

Section 1: Further Study/Training

  1. Further biochemical study or training Includes postgraduate courses for MSc, PhD and research assistantships where the assistant is registered for a higher degree by research.
  2. Teacher training, eg PGCE courses.
  3. Non-biochemical study or training Includes courses in accountancy, law, computing, library and information work etc., but not intercalating medical students Those taking professional qualifications whilst in employment have been classified under 3.
  4. Intercalating medical students returned to clinical studies

Section 2: Employment that requires biochemical knowledge

  1. Research Appointments-Industry Both temporary and permanent employment are included. CASE students are classified under 1.1.
  2. Research Appointments-Research Institutes, Institutes of Higher Education Post-doctoral research is included in this section.
  3. Hospital laboratories
  4. Civil Service and Public Authorities Includes government and local authority laboratories which are mainly involved in applied or service work, public health and public analyst laboratories etc.
  5. Non-Laboratory Based Employment Management and management training, sales, marketing, information and editorial work where scientific knowledge is required but the work is not laboratory-based. Also includes direct entry into teaching in schools and further education colleges - not those catering for degree-type work. Teacher training courses are classified under 1.2.
  6. Teaching-Higher Education Permanent and temporary teaching appointments in institutions of higher education.

Section 3: Non-scientific Employment

  1. Other employment Any jobs that require no particular scientific knowledge ie are open to graduates of any discipline.

Section 4: Abroad

  1. Employment abroad Any employment abroad unless of a temporary nature. In cases of temporary employment classification is on type of employment to which person is likely to return, if known - for example categories 1.1, 2.1, etc. "Dead-end"-type jobs (au-pairs, chalet-girls, world travellers etc.) where the eventual career or job is not known are classified under 5.1.
  2. Study/Training Abroad Any type of study or training abroad similar to that described under Section 1
  3. Returned home This section includes any non-British students who have returned to their home country after studying in the UK. If a foreign national has remained in this country for further study or to take up employment he/she has been classified in the appropriate section.

Section 5 : Unplaced

  1. Unplaced, not seeking employment Those who have opted out, eg. to travel, to bring up a family. Also includes those who are filling in time in temporary jobs whilst looking for a permanent post in their chosen career eg. au-pairs, chalet-staff etc
  2. Unplaced, seeking employment These are the truly unemployed - still trying to find a job.

Section 6

  1. Unknown.


Report compiled by Mike Withnall, Professional and Education Section, October 1996




Biochemical Society/Portland Press
59 Portland Place
London
W1B 1QW
United Kingdom

Biochemical Society Membership Office
Portland Customer Services
Commerce Way
Whitehall Industrial Estate
Colchester
Essex
CO2 8HP
United Kingdom
Administration:
Tel: 020 7580 5530 - Fax: 020 7637 3626
E-mail: [email protected]

Editorial:
Tel: 020 7637 5873 - Fax: 020 7323 1136
E-mail: [email protected]

Meetings:
Tel: 020 7580 3481 - Fax: 020 7637 7626
E-mail: [email protected]

Membership:
Tel: 01206 796 351 - Fax: 01206 799 331
E-mail: [email protected]